Development and Construct Validity of the Classroom Strategies Scale-Observer Form Article

Reddy, LA, Fabiano, G, Dudek, CM et al. (2013). Development and Construct Validity of the Classroom Strategies Scale-Observer Form . SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 28(4), 317-341. 10.1037/spq0000043

cited authors

  • Reddy, LA; Fabiano, G; Dudek, CM; Hsu, L

authors

abstract

  • Research on progress monitoring has almost exclusively focused on student behavior and not on teacher practices. This article presents the development and validation of a new teacher observational assessment (Classroom Strategies Scale) of classroom instructional and behavioral management practices. The theoretical underpinnings and empirical basis for the instructional and behavioral management scales are presented. The Classroom Strategies Scale (CSS) evidenced overall good reliability estimates including internal consistency, interrater reliability, test-retest reliability, and freedom from item bias on important teacher demographics (age, educational degree, years of teaching experience). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) of CSS data from 317 classrooms were carried out to assess the level of empirical support for (a) a 4 first-order factor theory concerning teachers' instructional practices, and (b) a 4 first-order factor theory concerning teachers' behavior management practice. Several fit indices indicated acceptable fit of the (a) and (b) CFA models to the data, as well as acceptable fit of less parsimonious alternative CFA models that included 1 or 2 second-order factors. Information-theory-based indices generally suggested that the (a) and (b) CFA models fit better than some more parsimonious alternative CFA models that included constraints on relations of first-order factors. Overall, CFA first-order and higher order factor results support the CSS-Observer Total, Composite, and subscales. Suggestions for future measurement development efforts are outlined. © 2013 American Psychological Association.

publication date

  • December 1, 2013

published in

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

start page

  • 317

end page

  • 341

volume

  • 28

issue

  • 4