Why forensic scientists are essential workers Editorial Material

Houck, MM, LaBerge, GS. (2026). Why forensic scientists are essential workers . 12 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2026.100684

cited authors

  • Houck, MM; LaBerge, GS

authors

abstract

  • Forensic scientists, though crucial, are often overlooked in the “essential worker” discourse. This Perspective argues for their formal recognition as essential government personnel, aligning with federal definitions of essential and critical infrastructure workers. Their contributions are vital for timely criminal investigations, successful prosecutions, and protecting the innocent. Despite this, they operate within a “captive profession” under policing, lacking parity in pay, benefits, overtime, and furlough protections compared to sworn officers. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored these issues. While forensic laboratories were mandated to continue operations as part of the justice system's critical infrastructure, forensic staff often face budget cuts and hazardous work conditions while not being acknowledged for doing so. This highlights a systemic undervaluing of forensic science in public safety, where “life and limb” policing often overshadows scientific knowledge and methods that ensure accurate investigations, prevent wrongful convictions, reduce backlogs, and improve long-term public safety. Granting essential worker status to forensic scientists offers significant benefits for attracting and retaining professional personnel leading to sustainable staffing. Beyond mere symbolism, this acknowledgment is fundamental for establishing a sustainable, science-driven public safety infrastructure that values the contributions of technology and science as front-line and essential.

publication date

  • June 1, 2026

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

volume

  • 12