Reply to Tine!Hajdinjak and Nadja!Kokalj-Vokac's letter to the Editor re:: Re:: Mecedes!Marin-Aguilera, Lourdes!Mengual, Maria Jose!Ribal et al.: Utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization as a non-invasive technique in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.: Eur Urol 2007;51:409-15 and Alan M.!Nieder, Mark S.!Soloway and Harry W.!Herr.: Should we abandon the FISH test?: Eur Urol 2007;51:1469-71.: Eur Urol 2007;52:287-9
Letter
Nieder, Alan M, Soloway, Mark S, Herr, Harry W. (2007). Reply to Tine!Hajdinjak and Nadja!Kokalj-Vokac's letter to the Editor re:: Re:: Mecedes!Marin-Aguilera, Lourdes!Mengual, Maria Jose!Ribal et al.: Utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization as a non-invasive technique in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.: Eur Urol 2007;51:409-15 and Alan M.!Nieder, Mark S.!Soloway and Harry W.!Herr.: Should we abandon the FISH test?: Eur Urol 2007;51:1469-71.: Eur Urol 2007;52:287-9
. 52(1), 290-290. 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.065
Nieder, Alan M, Soloway, Mark S, Herr, Harry W. (2007). Reply to Tine!Hajdinjak and Nadja!Kokalj-Vokac's letter to the Editor re:: Re:: Mecedes!Marin-Aguilera, Lourdes!Mengual, Maria Jose!Ribal et al.: Utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization as a non-invasive technique in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.: Eur Urol 2007;51:409-15 and Alan M.!Nieder, Mark S.!Soloway and Harry W.!Herr.: Should we abandon the FISH test?: Eur Urol 2007;51:1469-71.: Eur Urol 2007;52:287-9
. 52(1), 290-290. 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.065
