Improved access and visibility during stapling of the ultra-low rectum: A comparative human cadaver study between two curved staplers Article

Rivadeneira, DE, Verdeja, JC, Sonoda, T. (2012). Improved access and visibility during stapling of the ultra-low rectum: A comparative human cadaver study between two curved staplers . 6 10.1186/1750-1164-6-11

cited authors

  • Rivadeneira, DE; Verdeja, JC; Sonoda, T

authors

abstract

  • Background: The purpose of this study was to compare in human cadavers the applicability of a commonly used stapling device, the CONTOUR® curved cutter (CC) (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) to a newly released, curved stapler, the Endo GIA™ Radial Reload with Tri-Staple™ Technology (RR) (Covidien, New Haven, CT). Methods: Four experienced surgeons performed deep pelvic dissection with total mesorectal excision (TME) of the rectum in twelve randomized male cadavers. Both stapling devices were applied to the ultra-low rectum in coronal and sagittal configurations. Extensive measurements were recorded of anatomic landmarks for each cadaver pelvis along with various aspects of access, visibility, and ease of placement for each device.Results: The RR reached significantly lower into the pelvis in both the coronal and sagittal positions compared to the CC. The median distance from the pelvic floor was 1.0 cm compared to 2.0 cm in the coronal position, and 1.0 cm versus 3.3 cm placed sagitally, p < 0.0001. Surgeons gave a higher visibility rating with less visual impediment in the sagittal plane using the RR Stapler. Impediment of visibility occurred in only 10% (5/48) of RR applications in the coronal position, compared to a rate of 48% (23/48) using the CC, p = 0.0002.Conclusions: The RR device performed significantly better when compared to the CC stapler in regards to placing the stapler further into the deep pelvis and closer to the pelvic floor, while causing less obstructing of visualization. © 2012 Rivadeneira et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

publication date

  • November 13, 2012

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

volume

  • 6