International expert consensus on precision anatomy for minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: PAM-HBP surgery project. Article

Nagakawa, Yuichi, Nakata, Kohei, Nishino, Hitoe et al. (2022). International expert consensus on precision anatomy for minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: PAM-HBP surgery project. . 29(1), 124-135. 10.1002/jhbp.1081

cited authors

  • Nagakawa, Yuichi; Nakata, Kohei; Nishino, Hitoe; Ohtsuka, Takao; Ban, Daisuke; Asbun, Horacio J; Boggi, Ugo; He, Jin; Kendrick, Michael L; Palanivelu, Chinnusamy; Liu, Rong; Wang, Shin-E; Tang, Chung-Ngai; Takaori, Kyoichi; Abu Hilal, Mohammed; Goh, Brian KP; Honda, Goro; Jang, Jin-Young; Kang, Chang Moo; Kooby, David A; Nakamura, Yoshiharu; Shrikhande, Shailesh V; Wolfgang, Christopher L; Yiengpruksawan, Anusak; Yoon, Yoo-Seok; Watanabe, Yusuke; Kozono, Shingo; Ciria, Ruben; Berardi, Giammauro; Garbarino, Giovanni Maria; Higuchi, Ryota; Ikenaga, Naoki; Ishikawa, Yoshiya; Maekawa, Aya; Murase, Yoshiki; Zimmitti, Giuseppe; Kunzler, Filipe; Wang, Zi-Zheng; Sakuma, Leon; Takishita, Chie; Osakabe, Hiroaki; Endo, Itaru; Tanaka, Masao; Yamaue, Hiroki; Tanabe, Minoru; Wakabayashi, Go; Tsuchida, Akihiko; Nakamura, Masafumi

authors

abstract

  • Background

    The anatomical structure around the pancreatic head is very complex and it is important to understand its precise anatomy and corresponding anatomical approach to safely perform minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD). This consensus statement aimed to develop recommendations for elucidating the anatomy and surgical approaches to MIPD.

    Methods

    Studies identified via a comprehensive literature search were classified using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network method. Delphi voting was conducted after experts had drafted recommendations, with a goal of obtaining >75% consensus. Experts discussed the revised recommendations with the validation committee and an international audience of 384 attendees. Finalized recommendations were made after a second round of online Delphi voting.

    Results

    Three clinical questions were addressed, providing six recommendations. All recommendations reached at least a consensus of 75%. Preoperatively evaluating the presence of anatomical variations and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) branching patterns was recommended. Moreover, it was recommended to fully understand the anatomical approach to SMA and intraoperatively confirm the SMA course based on each anatomical landmark before initiating dissection.

    Conclusions

    MIPD experts suggest that surgical trainees perform resection based on precise anatomical landmarks for safe and reliable MIPD.

publication date

  • January 1, 2022

keywords

  • Humans
  • Mesenteric Artery, Superior
  • Mesenteric Veins
  • Pancreas
  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy
  • Portal Vein

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Medium

  • Print-Electronic

start page

  • 124

end page

  • 135

volume

  • 29

issue

  • 1