Evaluation of the Pfannenstiel incision for radical abdominal hysterectomy with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy
Article
Mendez, LE, Cantuaria, G, Angioli, R et al. (1999). Evaluation of the Pfannenstiel incision for radical abdominal hysterectomy with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy
. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 9(5), 418-420. 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1999.99058.x
Mendez, LE, Cantuaria, G, Angioli, R et al. (1999). Evaluation of the Pfannenstiel incision for radical abdominal hysterectomy with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy
. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 9(5), 418-420. 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1999.99058.x
Radical abdominal hysterectomy with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (RAH/P + PAL) has classically been described through a low midline vertical incision. Transverse incisions have been used with good results for various pelvic surgical procedures. Hesitancy has been encountered when utilizing these transverse incisions in gynecologic oncology patients. In most studies, muscle-splitting transverse incisions seem to be of equal efficacy as midline vertical incisions in regards to surgical exposure and clinicopathologic data obtained and are known to be superior in cosmesis and postoperative morbidity. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify 25 patients who underwent RAH/P + PAL for stage I carcinoma of the cervix from 1990 to 1998 through a nonmuscle splitting (Pfannenstiel) abdominal incision. All patients were seen and had follow-up in the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Miami School of Medicine/Jackson Memorial Medical Center (Miami, FL). Data were collected on various clinical and surgical parameters including height/weight, operative time, blood loss, number of lymph nodes obtained, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Analysis of the data revealed that operative time and average blood loss were within acceptable parameters. The yield at lymphadenectomy for pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes was also respectable. Postoperative complications were minimal and there were no wound complications reported. Therefore, the Pfannenstiel incision can be safely utilized in a select group of patients undergoing RAH/P + PAL.
