Higher prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with carotid stenosis but without diabetes Article

Kang, SS, Littooy, FN, Gupta, SR et al. (1999). Higher prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with carotid stenosis but without diabetes . SURGERY, 126(4), 687-692. 10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70123-6

cited authors

  • Kang, SS; Littooy, FN; Gupta, SR; Johnson, GR; Fisher, SG; Cote, WL; Steffen, GF; Mansour, MA; Labropoulos, N; Maggio, JC

authors

abstract

  • Background. We compared abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) prevalence in 3 groups of patients at the Hines Veterans Affairs Medical Center: (1) patients with 50% or more carotid stenosis, (2) patients with less than 50% stenosis, and (3) patients screened for the Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) study. Methods. Of all the patients referred to the vascular laboratory for carotid duplex examination during a 12-month period, patients with 50% or more carotid stenosis underwent ultrasonography of the abdominal aorta unless they had a previous scan or previous aortic surgery (group 1, n = 374). Patients with less than 50% carotid stenosis who had been screened for ADAM comprised group 2 (n = 139). They were compared with all patients screened for ADAM at our center during the same time period (group 3, n = 2477). Results. AAA of 3.0 cm or more were present in 18.2%, 12.2%, and 7.2% of group 1, 2, and 3, respectively; AAA of 4.0 cm or more were present in 8.3%, 5.8%, and 2.1% of groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Among patients with carotid stenosis, those patients without diabetes accounted for the observed increase in prevalence (21.9% ≥ 3.0 cm and 10.2% ≥ 4.0 cm vs 9.2% and 2.8% in patients with diabetes. Conclusions. The relative risk of AAA is 2 to 3 times greater in patients with carotid stenosis compared with patients undergoing routine screening. However, only patients without diabetes account for the increased prevalence. Selective AAA screening of patients who are not diabetic with carotid stenosis is recommended.

publication date

  • January 1, 1999

published in

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

start page

  • 687

end page

  • 692

volume

  • 126

issue

  • 4