Two phase 3 trials of adalimumab for hidradenitis suppurativa Article

Kimball, AB, Okun, MM, Williams, DA et al. (2016). Two phase 3 trials of adalimumab for hidradenitis suppurativa . NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 375(5), 422-434. 10.1056/NEJMoa1504370

cited authors

  • Kimball, AB; Okun, MM; Williams, DA; Gottlieb, AB; Papp, KA; Zouboulis, CC; Armstrong, AW; Kerdel, F; Gold, MH; Forman, SB; Korman, NJ; Giamarellos Bourboulis, EJ; Crowley, JJ; Lynde, C; Reguiai, Z; Prens, EP; Alwawi, E; Mostafa, NM; Pinsky, B; Sundaram, M; Gu, Y; Carlson, DM; Jemec, GBE

abstract

  • BACKGROUND Hidradenitis suppurativa is a painful, chronic inflammatory skin disease with few options for effective treatment. In a phase 2 trial, adalimumab, an antibody against tumor necrosis factor รก, showed efficacy against hidradenitis suppurativa. METHODS PIONEER I and II were similarly designed, phase 3 multicenter trials of adalimumab for hidradenitis suppurativa, with two double-blind, placebo-controlled periods. In period 1, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 40 mg of adalimumab weekly or matching placebo for 12 weeks. In period 2, patients were reassigned to adalimumab at a weekly or every-other-week dose or to placebo for 24 weeks. The primary end point was a clinical response, defined as at least a 50% reduction from baseline in the abscess and inflammatory-nodule count, with no increase in abscess or draining-fistula counts, at week 12. RESULTS We enrolled 307 patients in PIONEER I and 326 in PIONEER II. Clinical response rates at week 12 were significantly higher for the groups receiving adalimumab weekly than for the placebo groups: 41.8% versus 26.0% in PIONEER I (P = 0.003) and 58.9% versus 27.6% in PIONEER II (P<0.001). Patients receiving adalimumab had significantly greater improvement than the placebo groups in rank-ordered secondary outcomes (lesions, pain, and the modified Sartorius score for disease severity) at week 12 in PIONEER II only. Serious adverse events in period 1 (excluding worsening of underlying disease) occurred in 1.3% of patients receiving adalimumab and 1.3% of those receiving placebo in PIONEER I and in 1.8% and 3.7% of patients, respectively, in PIONEER II. In period 2, the rates of serious adverse events were 4.6% or less in all the groups in both studies, with no significant between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with adalimumab (40 mg weekly), as compared with placebo, resulted in significantly higher clinical response rates in both trials at 12 weeks; rates of serious adverse events were similar in the study groups.

publication date

  • August 4, 2016

published in

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

start page

  • 422

end page

  • 434

volume

  • 375

issue

  • 5